By Peter Wagner
Confusion reigns in sociological bills of the curent of modernity. The story-lines from the 'end of the topic' to 'a new individualism', from the 'dissolution of society' to the re-emergence of 'civil society', from the 'end of modernity' to an 'other modernoity' to 'neo-modernization'. This ebook deals a sociology of modernity in phrases of a ancient account of social ameliorations during the last centuries, targeting Western Europe but additionally taking a look at the united states and at Soviet socialism as particular variations of modernity. A primary ambivalence of modernity is captured by way of the double inspiration of liberty and self-discipline in its 3 significant dimensions: the family among person liberty and political group , betwen corporation and constitution, and among in the neighborhood located human lives and commonly prolonged social associations. significant old ameliorations of modernity are distinct, the 1st one starting within the past due 19th century and resulting in a social formation that may be known as geared up modernity, and the second one being the one who dissolves geared up modernity. it's this present transformation which revives a few key matters of the 'modern project', principles of liberty, plurality and person autonomy. however it imperils others, specially the production of social identities as ties among people that permit significant and socially plausible improvement of person autonomy, and the potential for politics as communicative interplay and collaborative deliberation approximately what humans have in universal.
Read Online or Download A Sociology of Modernity: Liberty and Discipline PDF
Best social philosophy books
The Das Kapital of the twentieth century. a necessary textual content, and the most theoretical paintings of the situationists. Few works of political and cultural conception were as enduringly provocative. From its booklet amid the social upheavals of the 1960's as much as the current, the risky theses of this e-book have decisively reworked debates at the form of modernity, capitalism, and way of life within the overdue twentieth century.
The commercial axiom is a truly common and in basic terms a proper precept of behavior. it's unimaginable that any one should still act with out utilising, good or in poor health, the very precept of each motion, i. e. , the commercial precept.
Marx's uprising opposed to Lenin, through negating the Leninist-Stalinist thought of dialectical materialism and tracing Marx's political philosophy to the Classical Humanism of Aristotle, overthrows the stultifying entrapment of Stalinist Bolshevism and contributes to the revitalization of Marx's approach.
This ebook examines the dependence of transhumanist arguments at the credibility of the narratives of that means during which they're embedded. by means of taking the foremost rules from transhumanist philosophy – the desirability of human self-design and immortality, the removing of all ache and the growth of human autonomy – Michael Hauskeller explores those narratives and the certainty of human nature that informs them.
- Albert Camus as Political Thinker: Nihilisms and the Politics of Contempt
- The Politics of Transindividuality
- Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart
- Pharmakon: Plato, Drug Culture, and Identity in Ancient Athens
- Modern Philosophy: From Descartes to Leibnitz
Extra info for A Sociology of Modernity: Liberty and Discipline
6 These questions will generate a set of terms and concepts, presented in this chapter in rudimentary form, that can be used and developed for a historical sociology of modernity, to be elaborated in the remainder of this book. With regard to the creation of social conventions, the social actors who promote change, their guiding ideas and their interests will be the focus of the analysis. If, as will be the case throughout most of this study, their guiding ideas are framed by the imaginary signification of modernity, and if the interests can be understood as the enhancement of autonomy and rational mastery, then we can call the agents of change modernize.
Even if one held the idea, as probably some seventeenth- and eighteenth-century thinkers did, that a social contract and its rules of implementation could be signed once and for all, the philosophical problematic was troubling enough. To complicate things, though, each of the reasonings laid foundations for a historical increase of liberties and, it seemed, greater substantive achievements if contrasted with the ‘pre-modem’ regimes. Compared to the late feudal and absolutist regimes with their ascriptive hierarchies and their detailed regulation of all aspects of everyday life, these ideas were no doubt liberating in the sense of setting free a dynamic of human-made change.
When related to concepts of enablement and constraint, of formalization of action and reach of action chains, these terms are more than mere arbitrarily chosen images; they allow one to grasp the historical production of social formations under the significations of modernity. Also, they will allow a view of liberation as more than autonomy, and disciplinization as more than imposition. Historically, liberations may be enforced and not willed by many of those who are exposed to them. And disciplinizations may be a countermove against external impositions by means of establishing capable collective agency.